Dr. Higgins received his Doctorate of Chiropractic (DC) medicine from New York Chiropractic College, and holds a BA from the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. Dr. Higgins has research experience in a variety of subjects, has taught graduate-level anatomy and physiology.
Question: Please speak to the relationships of the board members – each to their own impact on LifeQuest.
Response: CW Conner, Founder – Chairman/CEO founded the original LifeQuest which was an adventure racing team of the original LifeQuest (a team we started). It is a great platform for teaching life skills. You start to rely on everybody else in the team to bring up everyone else’s skills to something that allows the team to operate together effectively a lot like the military does.
Advisory Board members act as a sounding board for changes. CW has the advisory around the business aspect. I have the advisory board around the health services aspect of what we do. He can pull up research and come up with ideas, structures and new protocols and the board can act as people I can really count on to look at it critically and provide feedback, criticism etc. They don’t have any power over the organization; they are just there for advisory purposes.
The Board of Directors is there for a couple of reasons. They can help to guide the direction of the company. They are the ones that we work for. We created this company but we work for them now. Technically, they can fire you or hire somebody else. They help to keep the company’s mission on track. On the day to day sense, it is people like CW and me who help to ensure we stay true to the course and are most effective. Sometimes that means taking some tangents to come back online. Especially in a small organization like ours, we have to be fairly nimble. The board we have allow us to be very dynamic and evolve in the directions that we need to without nailing us to a very strict path of development like a big non-profit like Focus on the Family would have to be. Focus on the Family is a large ship; it takes some room to turn one of those suckers around. Therefore it keeps them very strict so they stay focused on the families. Whereas, we have to be nimble. The Board act as individuals who go out to be advocates for us, draw people to us for donations, volunteerism, for relationships with corporations, and through community resources.
Question: How intricately are the board members involved in funding?
Response: Our board is less geared towards fund raising at this stage as it is to helping us build this organization. We are young still and we are evolving considerably. The board that is there is to provide legitimacy and also to help us stabilize ourselves as we are moving into that state. We have people who work for us for the fundraising. They have a lot of freedom to do what they need to do. The board we are poised to building the structure of LifeQuest.
Question: What was LifeQuest Transitions’ start date?
Response: October 2009
Question: What professional organizations do you have associations with (both military and private)?
Response: Outside of Fort Carson, we have affiliations with Air Force Academy, local recruiting area/army recruiting area primarily. We are starting a relationship with Peterson Air Force Base, UCCS. As to the community at large – Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce, various other non-profits in and around the area ranging from Pueblo Warrior Support Center to include Denver, Operation TBI Freedom through Colorado Trust Fund. There are hundreds of organizations out there serving who overlap with the population we work. We have some contact with all of them and in cooperation with a great many of them. There are a lot of organizations that we have those collaborative relationships.
Question: Do you have a collaborative effort with the Chaplain’s office at Fort Carson?
Response: Not as much as I would like but that is something that recently I have been trying to make forays into in working with the Chaplains. Of course they work with a lot of the people we work with. I would love to work with them because the spirit aspect of what they do is highly integral. It is one of the biggest deficits that these soldiers have. It doesn’t allow them to develop the proper context with the truths that they have seen and been a part of.
Question: What is your job in facilitating LifeQuest’s mission – what do you actually do on a daily basis?
Mission Statement from LifeQuest Transitions their web page: http://www.mylq.org/
“To empower, with transitional programs and techniques to facilitate personal growth, leadership skills and positive change for our military’s wounded, ill and injured, through the use of fitness and adventure based learning.”
Response: Our titles are somewhat blithe and do not reflect the true nature of what it is that I do and what it is that CW does. CW being founder and CEO, me being co-founder and president, we wear many, many hats. The president, of course, is supposed to be more geared towards the daily operations and the personnel that are involved in carrying out the operations of the organization. Now, that being said, he and I share those aspects. He is more on the business side. I am more on the service provision side of what we do. So, he takes those individuals - those aspects of the staff and drives it. I drive the other part. In a traditional sense I would be the one that sets the hiring and firing policies. I would then ensure the performances are up and the organization is there to provide for the completion of the mission. I am also the individual – who wrote the curriculum and I drive the curriculum. I train all the people. I am involved in a lot more all the way from the actual application of the mission, to the individual soldier, to the creation of the structure to make that possible. My facilitation is quite broad at this point in time. As time goes on I will back more away from that and be more at an administrative angle in developing people to replicate those more individual touch-points that I have with the soldiers. Not that I want to lose that but at the same time it is becoming more and more of my job to represent LifeQuest in the community and do my academic work.
Question: Can you describe how the influx of deployments or returns might affect your daily operations?
Response: It changes things drastically. Because we are working with the military there is not this consistency of participation. On a daily basis – things like today, we will have worked with maybe a half dozen soldiers; whereas on a normal day 60 to 120 depending on the day. That is because today there is a safety stand-down; there are meetings and all those soldiers get drawn off. As it goes to deployments, we are going to hit spots where large and significant numbers of soldiers will get pulled away. That doesn’t mean that all of them. They leave rear detachments that still have the work of healing, soldiers potentially going into the med-board process and retiring them. Or, they are not fit to return to duty yet. You need that. As units come and go that increases the amount of interest we have being called into us as to utilizing our program. It can change things drastically on a moment’s notice. We have 2,500 soldiers over the course of the end of this month through next month and in doing that providing for those individuals, we are going to be quite busy. That does not mean all of them will become part of our program. We will make sure that they know our program is here. We can engage them if they are interested and able to.
Question: Do they have a set period of time where they can use this program and then it just drops off for them or not?
Question: Do they have a set period of time where they can use this program and then it just drops off for them or not?
Response: The curriculum is designed to run 120 days. In 120 days though, because we operate on an individual basis and it is not our program that you are going through – it is your program. We have a curriculum that you play with. When somebody goes through – you might go through the curriculum faster than someone else goes through the curriculum and you may find at the end you want to continue. You have more to get out of your time here. We have some soldiers here that they get everything that they need and want within 60 days (physically, emotionally etc). Other individuals stick around. One, because they are not through the med-board process and they still have a long time to go; and this, they find is a lot of stability and health here. Many times they volunteer. Right now there are three soldiers filling out volunteer packets. They want to volunteer and work in this environment with their brother soldiers to help soldiers healing. We try to engage the individual at the level they are at and then if they need to continue or they need more, they can travel down the rabbit hole as long as they want. We will eventually start hiring some of these guys on. That is the way we want it. We want the organization to look more like the product that we produce. That is, an individual who is self-motivated, stable and competent where they are at with the family and so forth – everything that a healthy person civilian or otherwise needs.
Question: Do the soldiers have to pay for the program out of their own pocket?
Response: It is all funded through other funding. The last year and a half we have raised only (amount available on transcript). That keeps the lights on and allows me to now, finally now, after over a year - to hire three other individuals. I can then have consistency and stability in the personnel that I have as it pertains to directly interact with the soldier. Up to this point, it has been 100 percent volunteer. CW and myself still have not pulled a paycheck from this organization. The majority of what has kept this organization afloat has come from his and my back pocket. I had a growing practice and as we got into this I pretty much closed that down. I stopped advertising and let that die off as put 80 hours a week in here. CW has done the same thing. There are a lot of opportunities to pursue other things but this is the end game.
Question: What would you consider liability issues that might impact your organization and the services you provide?
Response: From a practical sense, we are doing exercise and activities where there is always a chance for injury. Anything – walking across the street has its own liability. Then, of course, we try to mitigate that as much as possible by finding individuals (staff) who within the curriculum have a big heart and put their concern for the soldier over their desire to see performances or results – which is often times what happens in the fitness industry - the trainers put their desires on the individual instead of helping the individual find the desire to drive it the other way around. And then, we follow very simplistic rules in trying to reformat the individuals thinking on how they address themselves in the environment. Which is - you have to be the master of your own self. So, in everything you do you have a higher interest and pay attention to it more. Your self-awareness has to be higher. In doing that, you become a partner with the individual serves driving down the liability. Then you say “don’t do things that cause pain and let’s find ways around it?” Then, they are looking for where is the edge of that pain so that way I don’t go there. When you are taking that election time, you are taking that higher awareness – it allows the individual to be much safer in anything that they do (physically and in the environment we have created here).
Then, of course, the people we have working here from volunteers on are trained meticulously with knowledge of what is a safe operation and to look for those signs of things going south (stress etc.). Of course, we are doing outdoor activities and events. There are a lot of safety protocols to be adhered to in those environments to make it safe. Literally, in the adventure aspect of what we do you are safer doing what we have you doing – say climbing down a rock face – then you are in your own mom’s arms. It doesn’t feel like that. We don’t want it to feel that way. We want it to feel like what they need, which is that adrenaline and that aspect of risk they are taking. Even though if they all of sudden passed out and they didn’t want to come down, we have control of it. We don’t want them to have to see that. That would break that illusion. It is taking the same opportunity or window that it took them to get injured in and reformat that, re-contextualize that into something that is positive. It is kind of like practicing a phone number. The more you practice the new phone number the less the old phone number you can remember. Another behavior it is important where the less you practice it the better. Quitting smoking is a good example of that. When you practice not-smoking it makes it harder to go back to smoking. These behaviors are much the same in a lot of context. The only bad part is we are humans and we tend to will things to be. It makes things much more difficult than they need to be. A lot of it is subconscious. It is survival. With the stress disorders these guys have it stress. Stress overrides any sense.
Question: Do you use outside partner relationships to provide healing services to the soldiers? Do you have any specific requirements of those relationships?
Response: What we look for in those relationships are 1) we are very protective of the soldiers because we built up so much trust with the individual. The last thing we need to do is hand him over to an associate organization and then have him come back and say “those people are a bunch of loons” or “whatever they are doing it doesn’t work.” It reflects badly on the relationship we have tried to garner with the soldier.
We are also in trying to find solutions for soldiers that have effectiveness. Not just that it’s out there, it’s good and evokes a good feeling. Does it provide a result? There are a lot of organizations out there that do good things but its pat-on-the-back good things - things that provide a diversion but no lasting benefit. The example: the adventure aspect of what these organizations might use; it is very short-lived. They go out for a weekend and they come back and have a big smile on their face but that eventually dies away. What do you do with that inspiration that has been evoked in that individual is very important! Those things can be good diversions, but is it what they need?
They get so many things – particularly in the Wounded Warrior battalions get so many opportunities thrust upon them such as to go to a football game and have dinner with the football team; this hunting trip or that event. Eventually, they can become numb to all of the opportunities around them. They are not making good choices to pursue the things that will actually give them a benefit. They start turning down opportunities. If you are going to utilize a stitch of time or a brain power that a soldier has towards healing, it better be towards something that is effective. It would be the same thing as if you give a child the opportunity to always go and pick a toy out of the grocery store. Eventually they don’t respect it anymore. When you give them a toy it’s not like “oh, thank you so much” it’s like “oh, thank you so much for another thing.” It decreases the value of all the opportunities around.
Question: In your return-to-duty program, have you successfully returned-to-duty either paraplegics or amputees?
Response: Paraplegics are difficult for the military to deal with. It depends on what it is of course. Especially now with the draw down on the military budget, they are finding it very difficult to hold on to individuals that are not deployable. They are finding opportunities for some individuals. Fort Carson doesn’t have that many paraplegics. Most of the individuals we have suffer from stress disorders; there are a lot of peripheral joints, spinal problems and head injury problems are what you see through Fort Carson. Amputees – yes we had one individual who was able to return successfully to duty. We only have had a few paraplegics.
Question: I assume you work with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (small to large degree)?
Response: A lot – to a large degree. A lot of these soldiers have been in blasts so they have some minor brain trauma at some level to some severe. We see a lot of severe TBI through here.
Question (GB): On a facility like this, what is the insurance cost?
Response: It is volume dependent. It doesn’t matter about the severity of the individual we are working with; it depends on how many people we are seeing. We can see 1,000 highly functioning individuals and it will cost us the same as if we were seeing 1,000 paraplegics. It is based on the activities that we do and the volume we are seeing.
Question (GB): As long as they are still in the military, does the military fund the program for the individuals?
Response: This has been a free-ride for the military entirely. It’s been a free ride for the soldiers too. We provide the service for the soldiers and this allows the military to benefit. It doesn’t matter whether it is equine therapy, water therapy, to what we do to psychological counseling; unless it can be billed through medical process there is no chance for it to become an evolved point of service for the soldiers.
Question: Have you ever used water or equine therapy?
Response: No – not directly. There are a lot of individuals who have utilized equine therapy in programs all over the Colorado Springs area. It has been a recommendation that we utilize as to filling out the program for the soldiers especially as we enter the reintegration aspect of what goes on in Fort Carson. I can see that becoming more and more a part of what we do.
We are active with the board in Fort Carson and it is made up of entirely military organizations and two private organizations (us being one). The other one being El Pomar; and, El Pomar is the one that has all the money. We still don’t qualify for any assistance. They require three years of audited finances. We don’t even have that long of a history yet. At the same time there are a lot of effective organizations out there because these people have tenure over here. I will use the example of one huge national organization where their stand point is good will and back packs and they get millions and millions of dollars because they have the brand and the history. They can get those resources; but their long term benefit is just not present. And, additionally they don’t work with active duty soldiers (that is where you have to do it).
Kids, before they go off to college, the last opportunity you have to do anything is with those teenage years; if you don’t intervene then your opportunity to be successful with them later becomes less and less. The same thing with the soldier, the sooner you get to the time of their trauma – especially as they are making that huge transition into the civilian world - if you can make the intervention then (make the difference there) it follows them into their civilian life. That is where the biggest push needs to be. Unfortunately, 90% of the non-profits out there have no influence whatsoever.
As an analogy – if you coral the cattle the cowboys will come; we are a very unique group in that we went we went after the cattle - found the soldiers - the people who need the efforts. Now, because of that we have all these other organization coming and saying “Hey you guys have active duty soldiers. How can we benefit from that? We have resources and we can’t reach these guys.” The only reason we are successful is because we are tenacious as hell. That is what it takes.
Question: Do VA benefits help the soldier transition from active duty to civilian life?
Response: They all have the opportunity to take advantage of vocational rehab – which is fantastic. They all have opportunities for the transitional type programs which are out there. The only bad part is that (and this is one thing we try to stay cognizant about). A person is a holistic thing. They are not just a spiritual issue and are not just an emotional issue. Everything is addressed as a solution to a problem or an aspect of the person. It doesn’t address THE person. That is where those programs fall short because they never address the problem. They never address the person as a whole. Also, to take advantage of a lot of things you have to be in the right state of life and mind.
As an example: You want to run a marathon. You need to have a certain foundation to be able to do that. The muscles have to work right. Now, is it possible – don’t know if I don’t know you. Through some time and effort and doing assessment we can find that out. Then we can find out how to get you towards that goal. It may not be the exact goal that you imagined it to be. It means taking in the whole picture. Sometimes it is a very slow process.
Programs are out there that are designed to hit plateaus and then insurance cuts you off. There are always more benefits to be gained. You just have to change gears work harder. Insurance typically has this rule, if you can’t see more than a 20 percent improvement over a certain period of time - that must mean you have achieved the maximum medical improvement – you are done! I have been in the game of rehabilitative exercise and therapy for 24 years. I can tell you just when you hit that wall – if you try that different route and can find new improvement – particularly with brain injury. The brain is more plastic than any other body part. It does heal. Is it ever the same as before – no. But, you go to school and you aren’t the same. You hit somebody on the head and they are not the same either. It takes a lot of sustained effort and consistency to make a difference (particularly in brain injury). That is just not how the medical establishment is designed. For long term planning and care – it is just not there. Unfortunately, society is just not built for it either.
If you consider World War II, you had 18 percent of the population directly involved in prosecuting war. The rest of society was involved because they knew somebody. So when those individuals came back whether they were injured, had some mental injury or whatever these people were looked at differently than those people coming back today. This is because you have only less than 1 percent of the population involved. To the rest of us, it’s news – mostly bad news (often poorly reported) with no connection to the soldiers. When this person comes back, they have no connection to the soldier. When the soldier comes back, the reaction is “this guy’s acting like a loon. Why is he acting like that?” The understanding is not there. The soldiers don’t want to admit anything is wrong with their behavior either. Society has not prepared them for reality in living in the community. They see the results of their actions as without something to link them to reality. They see everything as if it is happening to them. Not that they are a part of a bigger piece. It is enough to drive anybody insane.
Question: Do you have on-staff handicapped employees?
Response: We have several soldiers having completed the program are now on staff. One staff member will be coming on staff shortly and was injured with PTSD. Another individual also went through similar things. And then one of our nutritional counselors, although she is not military, she is disabled and an EMT. As we move forward, as we evolve and as I am able to hire people, I need to hire individuals like that especially coming from the military. I need the company to look more and more like the product we are producing. That way the guy that sits on this side of the desk and is interviewing the potential participant can say – “How are you doing today? Are you ready to engage?” I can’t do the same thing because I didn’t go where the soldier went and see what he did. Even if you don’t know, it’s there always as the background conversation going on. Whereas the guy on the other side of the table, if he has got a similar background, he can reach in a little bit deeper to the soldier and help pull something out that I potentially can’t. As well intentioned as much as I love the guy across the table from me, there is always going to be that limitation there. I try to work real hard around it but I still run into that wall.
Note: This concludes the interview with Grove Higgins.
Many thanks to Grove for taking his time to detail what LifeQuest is about and his personal mission within LifeQuest. The soldiers are so very lucky to have such an organization and individuals within of such high caliber bringing healing and attention to their very worthy healing needs.
A tour of the LifeQuest facility followed this interview. If you wish to see pictures please see the travel log for March 17, 2011.
A tour of the LifeQuest facility followed this interview. If you wish to see pictures please see the travel log for March 17, 2011.